Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Politics and religion: two polarizing topics that deserve their own little place

Re: Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Postby ChemicalKat » April 15th, 2018, 4:55 pm

WildcatEngineer wrote:States and Federal just do what Liberals always do. Tax the pension.


Well it's income. IRAs eventually get taxed too
ChemicalKat
 
Posts: 406
Joined: September 11th, 2017, 9:18 am

Re: Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Postby ChemicalKat » April 15th, 2018, 4:56 pm

WIldWIllieCat wrote:was I right or what?


When you're right you're right.
ChemicalKat
 
Posts: 406
Joined: September 11th, 2017, 9:18 am

Re: Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Postby ToledoCat#2 » April 15th, 2018, 5:10 pm

I have no problem with public employees pension plans, except that they can get too extravagant in many cases. Better to have a modest retirement fund that goes a long way in time than a plush one that goes broke. I don't give a damn what public job anyone does, he/she doesn't warrant $75,000 PER MONTH -- or more in the case of Oregon's retired football coach.
ToledoCat#2
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: December 2nd, 2017, 9:53 am

Re: Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Postby ChemicalKat » April 15th, 2018, 8:21 pm

ToledoCat#2 wrote:I have no problem with public employees pension plans, except that they can get too extravagant in many cases. Better to have a modest retirement fund that goes a long way in time than a plush one that goes broke. I don't give a damn what public job anyone does, he/she doesn't warrant $75,000 PER MONTH -- or more in the case of Oregon's retired football coach.


The 401k model makes a lot more sense than the pension model. But people have been planning their retirement with their EARNED pensions in mind and taking them away because "public employee pensions = $$$ probelms" incredibly cruel.
ChemicalKat
 
Posts: 406
Joined: September 11th, 2017, 9:18 am

Re: Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Postby NealyFan » April 15th, 2018, 9:22 pm

We used to have a great pension system in this country - private and public. However, starting in the eighties, corporations and vulture capitalists used bankruptcy law, mergers and acquisitions, and numerous other legal maneuvers to raid the funds and walk away from their obligations. Meanwhile, CEOs are paid in the millions to tens of millions and upper management has their golden parachutes. How about a little outrage over that?

Pretty sure DMC would be upset if the messed with his cop pension.
NealyFan
 
Posts: 830
Joined: September 26th, 2017, 9:18 am

Re: Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Postby 02Cat » April 16th, 2018, 9:05 am

NealyFan wrote:We used to have a great pension system in this country - private and public. However, starting in the eighties, corporations and vulture capitalists used bankruptcy law, mergers and acquisitions, and numerous other legal maneuvers to raid the funds and walk away from their obligations. Meanwhile, CEOs are paid in the millions to tens of millions and upper management has their golden parachutes. How about a little outrage over that?

Pretty sure DMC would be upset if the messed with his cop pension.

Silly Nealy...bringing up a real problem on this forum. Jeesh.
"Think about how stupid the average person is, and then realize that half of 'em are stupider than that." - George Carlin
User avatar
02Cat
 
Posts: 1916
Joined: September 3rd, 2013, 12:16 pm

Re: Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Postby ToledoCat#2 » April 16th, 2018, 9:10 am

I'm with Nealy on this one about vulture corporations.

However, I'm not going to absolve the DeLPS in Congress for taking funds from SS and putting the money in the general fund. That's when the problems with SS started.
ToledoCat#2
 
Posts: 1060
Joined: December 2nd, 2017, 9:53 am

Re: Public employees retirements = $$$ problems

Postby NealyFan » April 16th, 2018, 10:12 am

ToledoCat#2 wrote:I'm with Nealy on this one about vulture corporations.

However, I'm not going to absolve the DeLPS in Congress for taking funds from SS and putting the money in the general fund. That's when the problems with SS started.


That is not what happened. When SS had a surplus, they invested in US treasury bonds. In order to cover up the size of the debt, both parties treated those investments assets and not liabilities. When the debt becomes due, both parties look to increase retirement age, cut benefits, etc, so as to avoid the full brunt of the liability.

It yes, DeLPS are as responsible as anyone for this issue
NealyFan
 
Posts: 830
Joined: September 26th, 2017, 9:18 am

Previous

Return to Gods and Generals

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

About Us

Welcome to K-StateFans.com, the K-State community BY fans, FOR fans of the wildcats! Feel free to create an account and join in the discussion.