And there it is. You need him for the Senate votes. It is moral depravity. And I'm not talking about his moral depravity. I'm talking about the moral depravity of those who would support him for crass political reasons. That moral decrepitude, the inability to tell right from wrong, when politics are involved, is tearing our country apart. You talk about him denying it...his denials are weak. Did you hear that Hannity interview?KITNooga wrote:not that it matters, because I don't have a vote in the State of Alabama, but yes, I would vote for Roy for the following reasons:xtrawildcat wrote: Get off the fence. 'Would you vote for this guy with what you know right now.
1. intellectual giants outside my state interfering in the election. Call it the 'russian factor' driving me to elect the guy those illegal outside forces want me to pass on.
2. if the charges prove true, we can re-set and change horses.
3. Folks seem to think because he denies the allegations that he's guilty. Innocent folks ALSO deny false accusations. We certainly don't KNOW which of these Roy 'is'.
4. the vote isn't today, it isn't tomorrow, it's Tuesday Dec 12.
there's time not to have a cow. there's time TO have a cow. the point is there's TIME yet before the decision has to be made.
as you asked, with what I KNOW, yes I would vote for Roy. Same logic that had me vote for Trump. it's about the agenda. with trump is was SCOTUS.
as for roy, more GOP is needed to pass key legislation.
as for that key legislation: I will forever hold McCain responsible for his absolute and outright lying to his constituents to get re-elected. So much for 'ethical senators' (as if we all don't understand that ethical congressmen, senators are not oxymorons). McCain coughed up any opportunity at a 'legacy'. He is and always has been a Dem working inside the GOP. at best he's an indictment of the subterfuge of the GOP establishment against the electorate.
"Let me ask you this you do remember these girls would it be unusual for you as a 32 year old guy to have dated a woman as young as 17? That would be a 15 year difference or a girl 18. Do you remember dating girls that young at that time?" Hannity asked.
"Not generally, no," Moore answered. "If did, you know, I'm not going to dispute anything but I don't remember anything like that."
The entire interview was like this. And it is coming out that he had been banned from the mall because he was relentlessly pursuing teens there. The evidence is compelling. He should be prosecuted, though doing so after 40 years is difficult. But regardless of that, this man does not belong in the Senate.
I encourage you to take a step back and really think about this...not from a political perspective, but a human perspective. Forget this arguing on the internet aspect and the desire to "win the argument". Is this really who you want to be as a person? Supporting someone that would do something like this?