xtrawildcat wrote: ↑April 23rd, 2024, 5:46 pm
learnin wrote: ↑April 23rd, 2024, 2:22 pm
I have a novel idea. Those players, who have left a school in order to get a bigger payday at another school, should don a jersey with a dollar sign on the front instead of the school logo. What is better, the player should have the name of the donor emblazoned across his chest. Let’s just be honest about this situation.
How about the player who gets pushed out as they have been forever. What jersey should they don.
Should only the players turn down more money to be loyal to their school?
What about coaches and athletic directors? Professors? Secretaries?
Should mid major coaches and players turn down opportunities at bigger schools that can provide them many more opportunities in the future?
Just asking.
There's probably a balance to be struck here. Sure, it's normal to seek better opportunities and take them if they become available. On the other hand, what we are witnessing in the current transfer portal/NIL situation is nothing short of chaos. Kids transferring three, four, and even five times during their college careers. Kids chasing $$$, with no loyalty to the school they play for currently -- always looking for a better deal. It was mentioned this morning that now top players are charging large sums of money just to VISIT a school and then lining up several visits.
In football, a kid can enter the portal in December, join a new team, get an NIL package from his new school, and the following April, hit the portal again, never playing a single down for the school he transferred to, while taking their money. If coaches, athletic directors, professors, secretaries, and just your average worker pulled these kinds of shenanigans, they would be roundly criticized and probably never be hired again. How could you trust them?